Meade lx200 vs celestron

Meade lx200 vs celestron. Mar 17, 2012 · Posted 17 March 2012 - 11:01 PM. 86 μm x 5. Internal Focusing Mechanism. Im not trying to start a flame war about which manufacturer is better i just would like to know which of these two scopes is better and maybee hear there pros and Compare Celestron NexStar 8SE vs Meade LX85 vs Celestron NexStar Evolution 8. Feb 6, 2023 · I don't know if you would see much difference in your scopes though. It was the same money at the time and has one inch more aperture. I came back with a list of recommendations: Skywatcher Explorer 200p DS on a HEQ5 pro Synscan Mount. 25 is the focal ratio of the primary mirrors, f/2 vs. However, for reasons I can’t explain, I’m selling the Celestron 11 and keeping the Meade 10. The guy said it comes with an upgraded sturdier tripod, five or six EPs and a few filters, and is apparently in very fine condition. OTA's The optics on one are good, the other very good. Celestron CGE - posted in Cats & Casses: Ive been comparing the Meade LX200 and the Celestron CGE 1100 for some time and I was wondering which was better in a mix of both visuals and astrophotography. Show More. f/2. I suspect the Meade might be better as it uses an aspheric (elliptical) primary. Apr 29, 2007 · A Titan will likely be fine but I have no experience with those. Feb 17, 2011 · 10Meade LX200 vs Celestron 11Aspheric on CEGM - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Hi all. As for buying from the manufacturer vs. They are big though. I'm looking at the Meade 12" LX200 ACF and the Celestron C11 SCT, since they are the largest Oct 5, 2023 · In this video I am going to be comparing a Meade LX85 and a Celestron NexStar 8SE telescope. The Xcel LX have better eye relief but less AFOV. Meade LX200-ACF for Imaging - posted in Cats & Casses: Maybe this has been discussed and beat to death, but I cant seem to resolve this issue in my head. Our club "upgraded" from a LX200 Meade 16" to a C14 on an Astrophysics 1200 mount. Meade LX200-ACF 203mm f/10 Catadioptric GoTo Telescope. The weak link in the Xcel LX series is the 18mm, the Maxvision is the 14mm, the AT UWA is the 16mm. Embark on your cosmic journey with assurance, knowing the universe is waiting patiently for your gaze Aug 10, 2005 · Celestron 11 GPS vs. Both Meade and Celestron telescopes stand tall in astronomy, each offering stellar features, innovation, and performance. 25 ota and ran across a meade classic 10 lx200 for a good price. Explore Scientific FirstLight 100mm f/14 Alt-Az Maksutov-Cassegrain Telescope with Twilight Nano Mount. At the heart of the Celestron Inspire 100AZ Refractor Telescope is a large 100mm objective lens, while Overall, the specs of the two scopes are comparable, other than the hybrid RC/SCT design of the Meade. 75" diameter steel legs which work well but are not quite as heavy duty as the old CG5 and LXD75 mounts which had 2" legs. Multi-Coated. 7mm (like the ES-82 6. Klean Kanteen TKWide 20 oz Insulated Bottle with Cafe Cap (Matte Black Gold Base) Value $32. CPC Deluxe 1100 - posted in Cats & Casses: I will soon have a new observatory, and I plan in the next year or two to buy a larger scope to put in it. The LX200 is a different price point than the CPC. So 20% more field of view, light transmission, at the cost of 20% of the "Zoom". Bill. Keep in mind you CAN control it with your iPad/Tablet/iPhone using SkySafari with either a serial connection or wifi connection. Dec 9, 2013 · But after looking around I came across the Meade ACFs. I have a Celestron Nextstar 8 and a Meade LX200 GPS 14. 25 is the star of the range. Is this worth spending the extra money? Thanks for your opinion! nick Meade has a better two speed focuser and the Meade mirror assembly is mounted on bearings, the Celestron mirror assembly slides up and down the tube on grease. 3 reducers that were made soon after they switched production to China from Japan. My wife agrees that there is more to life than saving every last penny for retirement and the kids college fund. The C14 and AP mount cost $10,000 less. On the OPT website the Meade 14 ACF is stated to be 63 lbs. The best one is on a professional class mount, the other the standard factory mount. Very happy with decision, the CPC is working well, surprisingly refractor like images when the seeing is good & it's had a decent cooling interval. Posted 20 October 2020 - 07:17 AM. Celestron NexStar Evolution 8 203mm f/10 Schmidt-Cassegrain GoTo Telescope . The reason the price is less than the HD Celestron's is that the LX series has a lighter duty tripod and fork mount and motor. The LX200 10 is about $1000 more than the 9. Both of these are Corrected SCTs and a CSCT just does better for imaging. Available at budget prices in the used mart. Jun 23, 2015 · Meade 8" LX90 ACF VS Celestron 8" Advanced VX SCT - posted in Cats & Casses: Hey Folks, I know that this topic has probably been beaten to death, and then some, but I need some serious direction. Its all new to me! So if you have thoughts - dollar for dollar - best of planetary, photography, deep space Aug 3, 2010 · Used 8 LX200 GPS Vs New Celestron 8SE or C8SGT - posted in Beginners Forum (No Astrophotography): Thanks in advance for helping meNew to astronomy and want to slowly move to astrophotography. 3mm, 5mm, & 7mm. B&H # EXFLMAK100MC MFR # FL-MC1001400TN. HD. But even cropping to a comparable area for a 1:1 shows significantly better results on the LX850. I noticed that Meade has a new LX90 ACF 10inch with a weight of 50lbs and the 12 inch has a weight of 60 lbs. Highlights of Celestron. I prefer the Meade software, though I've seen many posts that say the opposite. Would I be better getting the 10inch meade? Is the CPC a higher quality scope that would make the weight difference irrelevant Feb 12, 2015 · Ahhh, the big Celestron vs. Jun 30, 2009 · Page 1 of 2 - Celestron C11 vs C9. Anyone know if there is any difference in quality between the two? I'm looking for a focal reducer for my Nexstar 8SE, but I dont want to waste extra money if I don't need to. So the past is just that past. It is an EQ5 capacity mount, a step above the CG4. Celestron 11 CGEM DX HD - posted in Cats & Casses: For a combination visual/AP platform, which would you choose and why? Mar 21, 2024 · Meade provides the LX90, LX200, and LX600 mounts, while Celestron offers the Nexstar Evolution mount for 8″ and 9. 7mm) Explore Scientific 82 14mm, non-waterproof. Optical equivalents, more or less. Feb 10, 2021 · I have two Meade LX200 16". Even the LX90 ACF is more expensive than the CPC, but only marginally, probably due to a marinally larger aperture. What a wonderful scope. The other issue with the Meade scope is its weight. Oct 14, 2022 · Page 1 of 2 - Meade vs Celestron - posted in Cats & Casses: Does anyone know why Meade telescopes cost less than Celestron? Does Meade not include things like a visual back? Finderscope? Ive always been curious what the reasoning was. Jul 10, 2018 · As it happens, a used 8" Meade LX200-GPS is for sale on CL just 5 minutes away from me for CAD$1700. I have a mount that supposedly can hold 60 pounds. 25 SGT XLT (CG5) - Meade LT 8" I have heard the Meade ACF optics are excellent and that the C9. As far as the images produced by the C11 and C9. $37999. I currently own two Meade Schmidt-Cassegrain telescopes and I u Dec 20, 2007 · Byt most notably, the CPC has a greater clearance between the diagonal and the base. The Meade/ES eyepieces tend to sell used for more than the AT's sell for new. 5mm in specs. 3? Define "same", I guess. 25″ models, and the CPC fork mount for 11″ and 14″ SCTs. Dec 7, 2008 · Page 1 of 2 - Celestron C11 vs. Meade LX200 vs. My dealer of Jul 3, 2018 · The Celestron f/63 is selling for $113 and the Meade f/6. Any insight from readers that could help guide me would be appreciated. 95. Im looking at Celestron options as well but thought Id use this opportunity to understand differences between the LX90 and LX200. Can you please help? Thanks!Wassim H. I've never used one, and Meade reverted back to the standard 230-240mm focal length after this run. 25 vs Meade LX200 Classic 10 - posted in Cats & Casses: Hello. Celestron 11 CGEM DX HD - posted in Cats & Casses: I love fork SCTs for visual use or for short exposure Mallincam imagingbut lift one onto a wedge? I am over that. The C-11 XLT gave slightly better views. The Celestron X-Cel LX 25mm eye relief is stated as 16mm. COAST HX4 Dual-Color Utility Beam LED Clip Light. And the LX90 series does include a built in GPS. We paid $25,000 for the Meade and ended up selling it for $1500. As of 2017 Meade is much more responsive to customer issues and with supporting users of their equipment. Sep 28, 2003 · Celestron CGE vs Nexstar GPS vs Meade LX200 - posted in Equipment (No astrophotography): My first post here. There are MEADE LX200s on eBay that are NON AFC that do not cost arm and leg. I assume they both fit the 8SE. Comparing Celestron NexStar 8SE vs Meade LX85 vs Celestron Jul 12, 2023 · The LX200 is a rock solid mount up to the 12", with the 14" only being a bit oversize because they continued to use the same narrow base only extending the arms for the 14" a bit far for best stability. I am getting back into astronomy after a near 30 year hiatus - when I was a teen reading a lot of books and using a dept store scope. The Meade can also . The Meade version has a 1 year warranty. This camera has 1936 x 1216 pixels with a pixel size of 5. The Diamondback® HD redfines the scale of price vs performance, delivering a rock-solid optic that optically punches high above its class. If you want a closer optic comparison from Celestron, that would be the Evolution HD. 25 was an ota used on an equatorial mount and the Meade 10" was an LX-200 that was deforked when after a number of years the electronics in the mount died. If Celestron had made a 16" I would have bought Celestrons. Phase Correction. Were I to opt for either one, it would unhesitatingly be the Celestron. Product Range: From beginner-friendly refractors to high-grade compound telescopes, Celestron’s vast product range caters to all astronomy enthusiasts. Mid-teens seems to be a problem. I'm staying at the 8" range for scts, mainly due to the price and the increasing price of the mount to hold the weight. Also, the Celstron has heavier duty arms, bearings, gears. Jun 6, 2005 · A Celestron technician said it was hogwash when people say the 9. LX90. I had to choose between the 10" LX200 or the Nexstar 11 GPS, and I went Nexstar. This difference gives the C9. HD Lens Elements. May 23, 2012 · The one that used to visit here was pretty wobbly in Dec. (6) Includes Free. So why is the 11" Edge pushed more the the Meade 12" ACF? The Celestron NEXSTAR EVOLUTION 8 has an impressive aperture of 203. Their telescopes are as diverse as the celestial bodies they help explore. Wedges, the Meade X-Wedge or a Milburn wedge both I believe are superior for telescopes of this size than the Celestron Wedge for the CPC1100. I have been asked by my lecturers to look into some new scopes for undergraduate students, to replace their aging C5s, and 8" Meade lx200 Classic (I think). Apr 9, 2020 · At the time of writing this post, Meade was in November 2019, found guilty of price-fixing in order to maliciously finish Celestrons market share and they lost the case and were charged to pay Celestron $16. The Synta Maks are pretty good. 3 mm x 7. Meade ETX 90 vs NexStar 4SE- How they compare. In practical terms, this means that the Celestron is capable of capturing more light and detail in celestial objects, making it ideal for deep space Aug 26, 2017 · Page 1 of 2 - Meade 12" ACF LX90 vs. My wife is allowing me to buy the Celestron RASA 11 2. Includes Free. Fully Multi-Coated Optics. Based on all the articles and formum threads, I have narrowed it down to Used 8 LX200 GPS, New Celestron 8SE or New Celestron C8SGT. Some folks report that visually the Rs have slightly better stellar images. Here are some photo's of the two scope installed side by side on a 16" Casady Feb 24, 2006 · 10 Meade LX200 GPS or Celestron CPC 1100 - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: I am a 2 year etx-105 user and want to move up to a larger scope. 100mm Catadioptric OTA. Looking for expert input. Sep 29, 2015 · Joined: 14 May 2009. (6) iOptron Photron 200mm f/8 Ritchey-Chrétien Catadioptric GoTo EQ Telescope. . Mar 12, 2010 · Good Evening All. The 8 LX200 may be the smallest model, but its 8” aperture is large enough for those who are upgrading, and it provides the lightest weight. But it is a few pounds heavier than the C6 and the CO was quite large, somewhere around 44%. I liked the 2004 LX200 GPS Aug 8, 2007 · That would be the LX200 R models. Alignment: close but I give Meade this one. Yes, there was a run of shorter focal length Meade f/6. I will be using it mainly in the backyard (suburbs of Chicago). 25I feel that the C9. 25 was superior to those of the C11. 10 lx200 - posted in Cats & Casses: Oh boy im gonna start a war here. Celestron NexStar 8SE 203mm f/10 Schmidt-Cassegrain GoTo Telescope. But I don't know if the standard SCT version weighs this much. Jul 23, 2014 · I'm looking at new scopes and am finding it difficult to ignore the Celestron 11" scopes vs. The C14 is 21KG. In this video, we have explained the difference be Oct 3, 2009 · Page 1 of 2 - Celestron HD vs. Apr 9, 2020 · CHECK PRICE. And the number and quality of images taken with Edge series scopes was simply amazing! Especially the Edge 14. May 12, 2008 · Meade LX200-ACF 10 or Celestron CPC 1100 GPS - posted in Meade Computerized Telescopes: Im a new poster although I have been combing over the boards for months and reading everything that you have to say. Rubber Armor. So I have permission to spend some dough Feb 18, 2019 · The LX200 is more comparable to the CPC series Celestron telescopes. Provides a secure, non-slip grip, and durable external protection. According to the Celestron website the C14 (standard) weighs 45 lbs and the Edge 14 weighs 46 lbs. Meade 12 LX200-ACF - posted in Cats & Casses: Ok, Ive already made the decision to buy a new GEM for my Celestron 8se OTA, with the goal of getting something suitable for a larger OTA in the future. This would give you a slightly flatter field which is useful for imaging. the Meade 12" LX200. Id expect the LX600 to be far easier to hoist onto a wedge than the LX200s I used to deal with. Key Features. 1400mm Focal Length, f/14 Focal Ratio. But for the OTA I'd be considering getting either the EdgeHD version of the Celestron scopes or the ACF version of the Meade SCT. The Meade HD-60 25mm eye relief shows 18. I think the 9. They all came from the JOC, China, predecessors of today's ES Nitrogen/Aragons. Since I couldnt afford or want to port around an Edge 14, I chose an Oct 16, 2020 · Loc: Georgia. Having learned from previous experience that its better for me to save up and buy what I want rather than to buy lesser intermediate things that I can afford earlier, I have now saved enough Celestron C-11 vs Meade 10" LX200R. My last scope was an 8" LX200 with a wedge. May 15, 2017 · The biggest substantive difference between a used Meade 10 and Celestron C9. I'm 2 inches short of Dwights size and have no problems mounting the 70+ pound LX200. May 20, 2014 · According to Meade's website their ACF optics reduces field curvature. 8. As far as I can tell they are basically the same optical design except one is native F/8 vs F/10. The Celestron version includes a 2 year warranty. 5 being listed as a 7mm but why no Meade equivalent to the 2. That would be a more fair comparison to the CPC. I do some basic May 18, 2008 · Edit: Correction - The 16" LX200 mount is a lot heavier. Posted 29 September 2015 - 10:21 PM. A Meade LX200 and Celestron of the same aperture are about $100 different in prices. The LX90 is a very good kit, both optically and systems wise. Oct 20, 2017 · The Meade LX70 mount is nearly identical to the old LXD75 mounts. May 22, 2011 · - Meade LX200 10" (or 8") - Meade LX90 10" (or 8") - Celestron C9. With accessories and heavy eyepieces, you are looking at about 24 Lbs. between the 2 scopes mentioned which would first on your shopping list Jan 3, 2010 · Page 1 of 2 - Celestron Edge HD vs Meade LX200 - posted in Cats & Casses: Hi all,After lengthy search, am still undecided between an LX200 ACF 12 and a CGEM Edge HD 11. When my new 10" LX200R OTA arrived I spent the first couple of clear nights messing around with astrophotography issues. The only weight I could fine for a Meade 10" was for the "ACF" model which listed it at 12. The Meade is also faster for astrophotography, f8 as opposed to f10. The separation between stars that appear overlapping on the LX200 have very distinct separation on the LX850. 7 KG (which is about 28 lbs). Jan 15, 2014 · A Celestron 8 and 14 standard SCT, an Edge 14, and Meade 10" ACF as well as a Mak that I don't recall the brand or size and the Edge was clearly sharper and abberation free across the entire field, especially when using 82-100 degree wide field EPs, which a lot of folks, myself included, do these days. The LX200 as others have pointed out is more comparable on an apples to apples basis. Is there interest in contrasting Celestron vs. Just preference. Discerning professionals in the astronomy field often choose Meade telescopes because of their high-end features, high-quality optics, and diverse options. although 50 years interested, I am PURE beginner to astronomy, astrophotography. When cooled, well collimated, and in good seeing you get to see what they can do. 99. 25 is somehow better, he said visually it has no advantages. CALL NOW : +61 2 9518 7255 OR EMAIL BELOW. I already own a LX200 10 GPS and here is my opinion/review:OPTICS: I give to Celestron. LX200 - Visual or EAA Only - Differences? - posted in Cats & Casses: Im considering an aperture jump to 11-12 in a couple years and want to stick with SCTs. Like the rest of you, I would love to have a 14" or even 16" scope on my pier, but May 16, 2019 · I had a Meade 7” LX200 Mak. However, I haven't used a Meade or Celestron scope in 20+ years, so I don't know much about the current quality/performance of their recent products. The included GlassPakTM binocular harness keeps your glass close at hand, ready to deploy at a moment's notice, all while providing protection and Description: ASI174MM Mini camera integrates Sony IMX174LLJ / IMX174LQJ 1/1. 2 - posted in Meade Computerized Telescopes: I already own a meade lx850 12 f8 acf with focal reducer goes to f 4. I have a scope in design stage BUT will take years, so need something NOW to start making astrophotographs. On the third, mostly clear night I undertook a thorough comparison of this new scope with my trusty old C-11. The LX90 mount/controller isn't in the same class. Celestron seems to be having some issues, and the 8 Advanced VX SCT has been on backorder for some time now. I'm not sure who did their homework, Alph, but the C14 weight you quote is wrong. 25 vs. Jan 19, 2015 · C14 actually weighs over 52lbs and 14" ACF f/8 weighs approximately 56lbs. the need for a wedge with the Meade. Jul 1, 2020 · There are a few videos out on Youtube on the LX200 12" ACF, if you watch them you'll see from a size perspecitive, the 12" LX200 is bigger, but also more stable in my opinion. Hence no mirror flop on the Meade. It’s an 8”, f/10 telescope with an ACF optical system that provides a flatter field, no diffraction Oct 29, 2022 · The Celestron 9. Ultra-hard, scratch-resistant coating protects exterior lenses from scratches, oil and dirt. The CG4, SVP, and LX70 all have 1. 2, which is more than twice the size of the Meade Instruments 209006 Infinity 102mm AZ Refractor Telescope's 102 aperture. 1 mm). 2. Coating on roof prism models enhances resolution and contrast. 86 μm. But it performed quite well given the large CO. Celestron - posted in Meade Computerized Telescopes: All of the posts that have surfaced since the announcement of the RCX have been very interesting. I can understand the 4. I would imagine the ACF optics is a step higher than the optics of the 8SE. Yes it is a *little* flatter than the C8 or C11, but nowhere near as flat as the Meade ACF or Celestron EDGE HD scopes. Jul 11, 2007 · Having owned both a Celestron SCT (8") and now a Meade SCT (10" LX200GPS), IMO, the optics are equally as good, and its 'six of one and half dozen of the other', with regard to Celestron's XLT or Meade's UHTC coatings. One good reason for going for Celestron is that you could buy from a bombroof retailer to be found at the top of this page and know you'd get hassle-free after sales service. What is the claimed big advantage for the imager, if any, of the Celestron HD series over the already available and cheaper Meade LX200-ACF series. The 200 was a nice visual mount but utterly hopeless for imaging. 25 vs Meade LX200 Classic 10 - posted in Cats & Casses: I know these questions get asked all the time so apologies if you are sick of answering them!!Have recently reignited my interest in astronomy and have been a hobbyist photographer for years so the next logical step is to go the astrophotography route. Dec 15, 2020 · If you are thinking of buying a telescope then you must have come across Celestron and Meade's telescopes. They are the same. 25 is a great scope, but I think its reputation exceeds its reality a bit. Jan 19, 2005 · How about other contrasts Meade SCTs vs. Jun 8, 2009 · 10" LX200 vs CPC1100 - settled in favour of Celestron as the mount ergonomics are considerably easier though the weights are pretty similar. Motorized tracking is available but not go-to. 12-bit ADC and its QE peak is 77%. Fully Multi-Coated. Ive learned enough at this stage to be humbled by Apr 16, 2014 · LX 200 12 vs. Less field curvature? After using this scope for years for both observing and Astrophotography (planetary and some DSO), I have saved up to upgrade a little bit. From the picture, as you’ll probably gather the scope is large, and set-up on its equatorial wedge, the whole instrument weighs some ~150lbs. Im a visual observer only, and the contortions required at times by a GEM put my arthritic body to the test; so Im leaning toward an alt-az mount. Apr 24, 2013 · Page 2 of 2 - Meade 10 LX600-ACF vs. Really have to have a stable mount on either. Your pursuit for clarity, ease of use, and reliability in observing the boundless night sky will guide your choice. Apr 11, 2022 · Celestron Inspire 100AZ vs Meade Polaris 114mm reflector telescope: design and features. It looks like the Celestron gets slightly better reviews, particularly for ease of setup (due to handle locations, etc. 5mm while Celestron has 2. I have used the 14s on CGEs and the NJP. To me, the scopes seem to have pretty similar features. Are you sure? While both lines offer 9,12,18,& 25mm; Meade then has 4. Mid-line Celestron has more electronics hooking up to wireless so they get the nod. Skywatcher AZ GOTO mounts with the old C5 OTAs on them (since they Mar 2, 2011 · What about the LX200? Mike. For imaging purposes, the difference between a 10" and 11" scope, is minimal in terms of exposure time. 5mm & 6. Thanks! Jun 24, 2017 · Top end, no comparison as the 16" Meade is a beast compared to the Edge which tops at 11". Nov 3, 2023 · The LX850 12" OTA is an f/8 vs the LX200 which is an f/10. Modified RC like optics, and the same F10 focal length (unlike the F8 RCX models) as the traditional LX200s. Im starting to get tired of waiting and am now looking at other options. Celestron firststar is way off from finderscope, I even reset to factory setting to start all Jun 15, 2013 · Page 2 of 3 - Meade LX850 14 vs Celestron CGE Pro EdgeHd 1400? - posted in Mounts: LOL!For my money, which is not considerable, I took a long time looking around at images that were done with many different setups. Of the 2, the Meade (when still on the fork) was easier to use for the reasons that jgraham stated in his post. Oct 14, 2012 · Page 1 of 2 - Celestron 11 vs Meade 12 - posted in Cats & Casses: Hi all I am thinking of purchasing either a Meade LX200 12 ACF or the Celestron HD 11 EdgeI want the OTA only, as I want to mount it on an Orion AtlasOne main purpose is to get as large of a scope as possible that I can carry, and I want something a bit better suited for planetary imaging. 2″ sensor (11. Specifications. Great for off-axis guiding with SCTs and Ritchey-Chretien telescopes. The LX90 is going to be a bit less bulky and heavy than an Apr 3, 2008 · CPC 9. But it's sort of in a different class. Jun 28, 2014 · Page 1 of 4 - 11 Celestron Edge or 10 Meade ACF f/8 - posted in Cats & Casses: Hi,Ive owned two Meade SCTs that I liked a lot, a 10 LX200 Classic, followed by a 12 RCX400. Second part of my question relates to mounts - I have seen several of the mounts in the shops and seen them in action on youtube. The 10” Meade LX-200 ACF was about 10 years old and the C-11 XLT was on a CGEM-DX mount and was brand new. Oct 10, 2023 · The Meade LX200 telescopes have been a dream scope of mine and for many others for good reason. Talking about performance, UHTC 12" vs XLT 11" that 1" diameter does punch a bit higher in resolution, yet both suffer similar tube currents Nov 20, 2018 · meade 12"lx850 ota vs celestron rasa f2. and it was much easier to carry around. Jul 18, 2007 · Meade versus celestron C9. The Meade mount is ok mechanically but the electrics are a pita and will be upgraded with an alternative system shortly. 8 million. 3 is selling for $80. Assuming the initial reviews are positive, Ill probably be getting a CGEM, and in looking at those, it looks like it might be more cost effective to go ahead and Apr 24, 2013 · Page 1 of 2 - Meade 10 LX600-ACF vs. 25 OTA as 20 lbs. ), but the Meade might have slightly better optics. Both have died (not exactly endearing Meade to me), and Ive decided (in my dotage) to go the route of a mount with one or more OTAs. authorized dealers, there should be no difference. Meade Debate again! The Celestron is a nice little package, good to go like most SCT/ACF scopes under $3k. ENQUIRY TYPE. Mar 22, 2005 · The Meade 12” LX200 is a 30cm f/10 SCT, offered to the advanced amateur/college on a computerised fork mount, and large heavy-duty tripod. (67) Price. Jun 3, 2022 · I have both scopes and did a side by side visual comparison. Im really not trying to butIve been looking for a used C9. Apr 22, 2010 · Celestron CPC800 vs Meade LX90ACF - posted in Cats & Casses: I think I have narrowed my telescope search to the Celestron CPC800 or the Meade LX90ACF. 2" accessories and/or focal reducers will fit on the CPC but not the LX90. One thing is id like to be able to use the Stella with Aug 14, 2019 · Bill Barlow, on 15 Aug 2019 - 07:23 AM, said: Ralph, I once owned the 6” Meade ACF and it had very sharp optics, probably a bit better than the C6 I had owned before it. 25 but am concerned about the weight at 58lbs. Much sharper image then Meade. The Meade ACF 12" is only $100 more, so basically the same price, compared to the Celestron EdgeHD 11". Apr 11, 2011 · The Meade also has mirror lock and for non planetary work the flat field of the ACF is a big advantage. I would think that it would be best to go with the software you like to use as the mechanics and optics should both be quite similar. May 2, 2023 · Celestron stands as a titan in the astronomy world, boasting over 60 years of experience. The LX200 has a greater clearance there. 4mm. Good Luck! Jul 24, 2007 · Meade 14 LX200R vs Celestron 14 CGE - posted in Cats & Casses: Hi all, just a question i though i ask. Don’t know how good are the Celestron/Synta Maks. Granted you lose a little brightness for deep sky objects, but the contrast/dark sky background and more pin point stars made up for it. So it should be able to hold either of Jun 30, 2009 · Page 2 of 2 - Celestron C11 vs C9. Jun 21, 2003 · Page 1 of 2 - NEXSTAR11 GPS vs Meade LX200 10GPS - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: Well people I purchased the NEXSTAR11 GPS. 25 a slight advantage for contrast in my experience. No dobs allowed. Oct 5, 2014 · The eye relief spec was supposedly 18. It doesn't surprise me that one importer decided Feb 21, 2008 · Celestron lists the weight of the CGE 9. I am looking at the 10 Meade LX200 GPS w/ UHTC and one of the new Celestron CPCs (925 or 1100). I had an LX10 and an LX200. The Celestron is less money and they offer affordable equatorial mounts vs. 25 CPC. BUT what May 15, 2017 · The biggest substantive difference between a used Meade 10 and Celestron C9. The Celestron actually has a longer FL (3900) vs the Meade's 3550 or so. Ollly Oct 22, 2018 · The portability of the 8SE and LX65 should be about the same. Meade 12 LX200 - posted in Beginners Forum (No Astrophotography): Based on my budget, functionality, and usage, I believe I have narrowed my scope selection to these two scopes. I've narrowed myself down to two options: a Meade ACF 8" f/10 or a Celestron EdgeHD 8". Meade SCTs? Im sorry if this is an old subject. It weighs 28KG. ETX 90 is a Schmidt-Cassegrain with a 127mm aperture held by a 1900mm focal length and this results in a focal ratio of f/15 which is good for slow planetary observation and a narrow field of view and medium to high magnification. Back to Product List. My budget will fit either one of this. Comparing Celestron NexStar Evolution 8 vs Meade LX200-ACF vs Print Email . Add to Wish List. I only need to carry it out of my house about 20 feet. Plus at the time I bought it everyone said Celestron had the best tech Jan 29, 2011 · Quote. 5 being listed as a 5mm and the 6. I agree that Feb 7, 2014 · Celestron Axiom 23mm (like the ES82-24mm), Meade UWA-82 6. 3, respectively. Value $14. Mar 14, 2024 · Meade has no shortage of advanced telescopes for you to choose from. In the low $2,000s, you have options such as the LX90 or the LX200. 25 vs Meade LX90-ACF - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: I have been debating on buying a CPC 9. me vl bx jk ed ix rn co vh bn